Authors headline the LR price elasticities PP -0.52, NM -0.30, TE -0.30 and the SR price elasticities NM -0.57, TE -0.31 as their findings; for FT (900034) and CH (900036) their preferred models restrict the price elasticity to zero (LR test/Wald test, p. 181), so the coded unrestricted FT/CH values are NOT author-preferred. || "The corresponding elasticity estimates of electricity price are zero in sectors [FT] (food and tobacco) and [CH] (chemicals), -0.52 in sector [PP] (pulp and paper), -0.30 in sector [NM] (non-metallic minerals) and -0.30 in sector [TE] (transport equipment)." (p. 181, printed); "The short-run elasticity of electricity price, in contrast, is significant only in the models for sectors [NM] (non-metallic minerals) and [TE] (transport equipment), with magnitudes of -0.57 and -0.31, respectively." (p. 183, printed)
Bernstein, R., & Madlener, R. (2015): 'Short- and long-run electricity demand elasticities at the subsectoral level: A cointegration analysis for German manufacturing industries.' Energy Economics, 48, 178-187.