For deep analytical work, I don’t use one AI model. I make them duel.
For deep analytical work, I don’t use one AI model. I make them duel.
For thinking-intensive tasks (research, strategy, due diligence) a single AI model often converges too fast. It sounds convincing but skips edge cases and hidden assumptions.
So Tomas Havranek and I formalized a workflow to create structured disagreement:
🔹 Anchor (ChatGPT): Writes a first-pass assessment grounded in the files. 🔹 Audit (Gemini): Actively tries to break it (logic gaps, counterexamples, failure modes). ChatGPT defends. The duel iterates. 🔹 Synthesis (You): You analyze the conflict to see what survives.
The output is not “AI approval.” It is a clearer map of risks, boundary conditions, and what you must verify.
Advanced users: You can swap the auditor for Claude or automate this via API (MAD).
For everyone else: no code needed. You can copy-paste the protocol and try it via ChatGPT Agent.
Protocol (GitHub): 👉 https://lnkd.in/dRwKz63g
Research example: 👉 https://lnkd.in/dw98RKuW
#AI #DecisionMaking #CriticalThinking #Productivity #Research