KomentářeTomáš Havránek, Zuzana Iršová Havránková

If you plan to work on your ERC proposal this summer, the following tool might help you:

If you plan to work on your ERC proposal this summer, the following tool might help you:

https://lnkd.in/gAN6S747

It checks your draft at various stages against the official ERC evaluation criteria and rules, flags the routine weak spots, gives you tips, etc. The idea is to clear the easy problems before you ask humans, not to replace them.

Just read the privacy note first: use a paid model with training turned off, or don't paste anything sensitive.

We built this with Tomas Havranek, who was on the ERC Advanced economics panel in 2020 and is involved in the expert group supporting ERC applicants in Czechia.

You might also check our related tools: mad-research (https://lnkd.in/dtGSi8zP), which stress-tests your paper or proposal with a Claude/Codex debate, and paper-workshop (https://lnkd.in/dk5NQpcE), which simulates an expert workshop on your stuff.

If you have any comments or feedback, we'll be happy to incorporate them into the tools.

Screenshot of a repository page headed “erc-ai-feedback”, describing a small package that gives ERC Starting and Consolidator Grant applicants a rubric-based pre-review of a draft proposal in one chat session with a frontier model, to clear routine structural problems before workshop time is spent on them. It notes that it does not replace human review.

Originally posted on LinkedIn. Archived in full among all posts.