Abstract
In this paper we quantitatively synthesize empirical estimates of the income elasticity of gasoline demand reported in previous studies. The studies cover many countries and report a mean elasticity of 0.28 for the short run and 0.66 for the long run. We show, however, that these mean estimates are biased upwards because of publication bias---the tendency to suppress negative and insignificant estimates of the elasticity. We employ mixed-effects multilevel meta-regression to filter out publication bias from the literature. Our results suggest that the income elasticity of gasoline demand is on average much smaller than reported in previous surveys: the mean corrected for publication bias is 0.1 for the short run and 0.23 for the long run.
Reference: Tomas Havranek and Ondrej Kokes (2015), "Income Elasticity of Gasoline Demand: A Meta-Analysis." Energy Economics 47, pp. 77-86.Headline result
Income elasticity of gasoline demand: corrected for publication bias, 0.1 short run, 0.23 long run (Havranek and Kokes 2015, Energy Economics).
How to cite
Tomas Havranek and Ondrej Kokes (2015), "Income Elasticity of Gasoline Demand: A Meta-Analysis." Energy Economics 47, pp. 77-86.
BibTeX
@article{havranek2015gasoline,
author = {Tomas Havranek and Ondrej Kokes},
title = {Income Elasticity of Gasoline Demand: A Meta-Analysis},
journal = {Energy Economics},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.004},
}