KomentářeTomas Havranek, Zuzana Irsova

What is the optimal inflation rate? We have pre-printed a meta-analysis summarizing 777 estimates from 116…

What is the optimal inflation rate? We have pre-printed a meta-analysis summarizing 777 estimates from 116 studies that try to provide an answer.

Our best guess is that this literature is consistent with optimal inflation of about 0.6%. This might have come as a disappointment to some of my co-authors, but for different reasons. One of them has spent a lot of time arguing for zero inflation on average. Another spent many years as a central banker defending the standard 2% target. Well, you can't make everyone happy!

The estimates differ a lot, and we show which modelling choices drive the differences.

This is our first meta-analysis where we really used AI a lot for data collection, although of course the AI workflow there already feels like pre-history. The prompts are public if you want to see how it was done.

Disclaimer: most of these optimal inflation estimates are not estimates in the classical sense but come from calibrated models, so publication bias corrections and other meta-analysis approaches are a bit tricky here.

Measurement error matters too: official inflation can overstate true inflation (it doesn't fully capture better quality and new products) or understate it (the cost of owning a home is often only partly captured or left out). Depending on how big the net bias is and how you read the models, the gap between 0.6% and 2% can shrink, grow, or even flip. We discuss this in the paper but perhaps that's a good topic for another meta-analysis.

Joint work with amazing co-authors Matej Opatrny, Martin Opatrný, Tomas Havranek, and Mojmír Hampl.

Links in the first comment.

Links the author added in the comments:

A chart headed 'What is the optimal inflation rate?', with the subtitle '777 estimates from 116 studies, each coded for 57 features'. It is a histogram of the optimal long-run inflation rates reported in the studies, in percent per year, with the tails pooled at the 5th and 95th percentiles, minus 3.85% and 6%. The tallest bar, about 32% of estimates, sits at zero, labelled 'A third of all estimates are within 0.25 pp of zero'. A smaller peak sits at 2%. A red line and band mark the meta-analytic estimate of 0.6%, the mean of one preferred estimate per study with a 95% confidence interval of 0.25 to 0.97, noting that weighting and funnel-based bias corrections give 0.4 to 0.6%. A dashed blue line marks the typical central-bank target of 2%. The footer cites Opatrny, Opatrny, Havranek, Irsova and Hampl (2026), CEPR DP 21629, with paper, data and code at meta-analysis.cz/inflation.

Originally posted on LinkedIn. Archived in full among all posts.